翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ RE Amemiya
・ Re Anglo-Austrian Printing & Publishing Union
・ Re Astor's Settlement Trusts
・ Re Atkinson
・ Re Atlantic Computer Systems plc (No 1)
・ Re Augustus Barnett & Son Ltd
・ Re Australian Education Union
・ Re B (a child)
・ Re Badeck's application
・ Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No 2)
・ Re Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (No 8)
・ Re Barings plc (No 5)
・ Re Barleycorn Enterprises Ltd
・ Re Barlow's Will Trusts
・ Re Bird Precision Bellows Ltd
Re Blue Arrow plc
・ Re Bond Worth Ltd
・ Re Bowes
・ Re Brian D Pierson (Contractors) Ltd
・ Re Brightlife Ltd
・ Re Brumark Investments Ltd
・ Re Bucks Constabulary Widows and Orphans Fund Friendly Society (No 2)
・ Re Burley
・ Re Cardiff Savings Bank
・ Re Charnley Davies Ltd (No 2)
・ Re Chase
・ Re Cheyne Finance plc
・ Re Citro
・ Re City Equitable Fire Insurance Co
・ Re Cole


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Re Blue Arrow plc : ウィキペディア英語版
Re Blue Arrow plc

''Re Blue Arrow plc'' () BCLC 585 is a UK company law case dealing with unfair prejudice under s 459 Companies Act 1985 (now s 994 Companies Act 2006).
==Facts==
Mrs Watson-Challis was in the recruitment agency business. Between 1956 and 1982 she had built up a variety of businesses. In business she went by the pseudonym of "Sheila Birch". Then she met Mr Berry. They were impressed by each other's business talents and decided to set up a new company. She transferred her business and shareholdings to the new firm, Blue Arrow, in which she took a 45% stake. Mr Berry took a 55% stake. Blue Arrow had a variety of subsidiaries. Mrs Watson-Challis was the executive director of the subsidiaries and the "president" of the parent, while Mr Berry was the chairman. By 1984, Mrs Watson-Challis was travelling overseas, and no longer taking an active part of the company's affairs. The company was floated, it went public. Over time, with many others buying up new share offerings, her percentage of the shareholding went down to 2.1%. She resigned her directorships, but her position as "president" remained written into the company's constitution, the articles of association. Then she decided she wanted to come back. The management resisted, and they resolved to alter the company's articles so that she could be removed from her position as president. She petitioned the court that such action was "unfairly prejudicial" because she had a legitimate expectation to participate in the company's affairs.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Re Blue Arrow plc」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.